21 replies to this topic

[Nitrozzy7]

So, I've been thinking, why did the two most powerful nations in the world agreed to reduce their nuclear arsenal? The answer was quite clear. Vacuum "cleaners". By Vacuum "cleaner" I'm referring to a new weapon that will replace all the tactical nuclear bombs in the arsenal of both countries called FOAB (Father of all bombs). A pathetic name if you ask me...
The only problem these nations had with the nuclear weapons was that they couldn't use them due to various agreements concerning the use of nuclear weapons. FOAB came to solve that "problem".
See this wiki article.





As you've seen on these videos, FOAB is going to be used against "Terrorists".
I think theres one thing missing from all this, Rage Against The Machine.

Edited by Nitrozzy7, 22 April 2010 - 11:11 PM.

[clockwork1337]

dang....

sounds hot.

my friend just read part of it and decided thats how he wants to die.

[Dirge]

It will work just as well as it did 20 years ago.

Also, Vacuum bombs dont work very well in places with low air pressure IE during a Hurricane or a windstorm.

Edited by Dirge, 22 April 2010 - 12:58 PM.

[way2lazy2care]

nuclear weapons aren't used because of MAD. These weapons are many many times less powerful than most nuclear weapons.

[BLaZinG FurY]

nuclear weapons aren't used because of MAD. These weapons are many many times less powerful than most nuclear weapons.

I would like to see footage of what is the most powerful "Nuclear" bomb.

I think theres one thing missing from all this, Rage Against The Machine.

...I love Rage Against The Machine....

[тαg]

I would like to see footage of what is the most powerful "Nuclear" bomb.

People don't pull up their film cameras when a nuclear bomb is dropped on them.

Edited by тαg, 22 April 2010 - 02:52 PM.

[way2lazy2care]

People don't pull up their film cameras when a nuclear bomb is dropped on them.

the most powerful nuclear bomb wasn't dropped on anyone. I think it was the Tsar bomb, but I cannot remember.

[Dirge]

the most powerful nuclear bomb wasn't dropped on anyone. I think it was the Tsar bomb, but I cannot remember.

It was, and I'm sure they filmed it. Doubt you can get your hands on a copy though.

[TheShadowNinja]

It was, and I'm sure they filmed it. Doubt you can get your hands on a copy though.

It's been declassified supposedly.
Considering Discovery channel got their hands on the footage for something.

[Sir Kyle Aziz]

Seen it on youtube. Or something I think, might not have been the Tsar bomba, but was something definately huge. Apparently it fucked shit up in Finland and North Western Russia.

[BLaZinG FurY]

People don't pull up their film cameras when a nuclear bomb is dropped on them.

This is not the time to be a douche.
Save it for Crap Section.

Alot of times people videotape testing of a bomb just to keep a record of it...
or to show the world how it stands against others.
(Just guessing here)

Adding to last post:
So, can anyone post footage please?
Not quite sure why but i'm really curious as to what it looks like.

[Nitrozzy7]

I would like to see footage of what is the most powerful "Nuclear" bomb.

?! Ok...
Tsar Bomb wiki



(Goverment controled vid, I think)





(see 1:40)

And here's what nuclear weapons do to civilians (who survived).

Edited by Nitrozzy7, 23 April 2010 - 01:37 AM.

[TheShadowNinja]

So, nuclear weapons are being replaced by much less harmful normal bombs and this is a problem, how?

Nuclear bombs are, like way2lazy2care said, only not used because of MAD.
If it was possible to fire nuclear bombs without retaliation, you'd better fucking bet someone would have already done it.

[Nitrozzy7]

So, nuclear weapons are being replaced by much less harmful normal bombs and this is a problem, how?

These new scalar weapons are going to be used in the near future by the real terrorists.
Below is why I think these new ECO-friendly weapons are a problem.

• Partial Test Ban Treaty
• Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
• Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

What I'm trying to say is that nuclear weapons are baned.
These new Eco-friendly weapons are going to be used against "terrorists" with civilians getting killed too, as it always happen nowadays.
I guess the civilians will pay someone else's price.

Edited by Nitrozzy7, 22 April 2010 - 06:43 PM.

[TheShadowNinja]

These new scalar weapons are going to be used in the near future by the real terrorists.
Below is why I think these new ECO-friendly weapons are a problem.

• Partial Test Ban Treaty
• Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
• Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

What I'm trying to say is that nuclear weapons are baned.
These new Eco-friendly weapons are going to be used against "terrorists" with civilians getting killed too, as it always happen nowadays.

You want to stop weapons development because of the terrorists...

Right, okay.

[Nitrozzy7]

You want to stop weapons development because of the terrorists...

Right, okay.

When I say "real terrorists" I'm referring to the governments who own scalar weapons. I don't want to stop anything. I'm just being judgmental.
Sorry, but I want for governments to spend our money on improving people's lives, not fucking ruin them.
I know you don't care. At least allow the rest to.

I believe I don't need to tell you that you've gone off topic.
PM me. Don't waste your time trolling.

Edited by Nitrozzy7, 22 April 2010 - 07:25 PM.

[way2lazy2care]

These new scalar weapons are going to be used in the near future by the real terrorists.
Below is why I think these new ECO-friendly weapons are a problem.

• Partial Test Ban Treaty
• Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
• Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

What I'm trying to say is that nuclear weapons are baned.
These new Eco-friendly weapons are going to be used against "terrorists" with civilians getting killed too, as it always happen nowadays.
I guess the civilians will pay someone else's price.

we have had the capability to fire bomb all of these cities full of civilians and terrorists since WWII. This is just a single bomb that will do the same thing as if we would have dropped 200 smaller ones on them like we did in WWII or vietname

[TheShadowNinja]

When I say "real terrorists" I'm referring to the governments who own scalar weapons. I don't want to stop anything. I'm just being judgmental.
Sorry, but I want for governments to spend our money on improving people's lives, not fucking ruin them.
I know you don't care. At least allow the rest to.

I believe I don't need to tell you that you've gone off topic.
PM me. Don't waste your time trolling.

I've gone off-topic?
I could have sworn that was the entire point of this thread.

What you are essentially saying is that you want humanity should stop investing in and participating in war.
Do I really need to tell you have naive and futile that is?

[Hellswarm]

The threat of Nuclear Weaponry lies in the capability of ICBMs to deliver payloads incredibly fast. The USA was the superior during the Cold War because while the Russians made bigger bombs, the USA had the Jupiter Missiles that massively outpaced the Russian counterparts. The USA could have confirmed and responded to Russian missile signatures, launched their own, and had them detonate long before the Russian weapons reached their destination. That was a big reason why the USSR was interested in Cuba: due to its proximity to the USA. Both countries had at least 2x overkill capability so I won't go into that. There was no missile capable of delivering the 100MT Tsar Bomba (the 50MT test was delivered by a plane), so it would have essentially been useless were a war to break out. That's why I don't have a doubt that the FOAB is not the Nuclear Replacement you're looking for.

http://en.wikipedia....t_Global_Strike
http://www.nytimes.c...e/23strike.html

^That was what all the talk was about, I think just hours after the ratification between Medvedev and Obama.

Anywhere in the world in under an hour? Holy Fuck.

Edited by Hellswarm, 22 April 2010 - 08:05 PM.

[Nitrozzy7]

I've gone off-topic?
I could have sworn that was the entire point of this thread.

What you are essentially saying is that you want humanity should stop investing in and participating in war.
Do I really need to tell you have naive and futile that is?

You don't want to listen, do you?