all this tells me is that you were proven wrong and now you're reaching out to try and find something to continue the argument.
Smoking in all your articles reffers to tobacco. When you see a "no smoking" sign, is it ever referring to Marijuana? Contrary to what you may have heard from whatever voodoo conservative school of thought you subscribe to, there are many different ways to inject Canabinoids and some of which, when taken in a small dose, will over time sease to get you high, but still give you the same health benefits.
I'm not planning on getting a stroke, I don't have MS (or a history of it), but if I can add smoking pot through a water filtration system (or a vaporizer, or extracting the canabinoids through butter and or oil to cook it) and it give me a pleasurable experience while doing less harm to me than alcohol, why should that be a problem? You have yet to discredit that fundamental argument. The reason I posted both of those was because you asked me to find some benefits to smoking pot... and I did...
Now please, tell me why getting high is worse for you than getting drunk or smoking cigarettes?
This is just spin of some pretty iffy science
You've got to take some of these findings and realize that for the number of people who have testicular cancer, there are X amount of people who smoke pot. But, what about the hundreds of millions of people who have smoked pot in the world who DON'T get testicular cancer?
Edited by Dohregard, 23 November 2009 - 12:25 AM.