Jump to content

Welcome to The OFFICIAL Pure Pwnage forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

[pc] Empire Total War

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
Empire Total war

Just a quick warning: this is a big game. So I gave it a big review.

At first glance all Total war games look unbelievably epic. Much like in Azeroth the sheer scale of things may consume you, and you will probably crave it more and more with each time you play it. But again like World of Warcraft it will not take you long to discover the games disappointing underbelly. I am too harsh: There is still a lot of fun to be found here.

Land Battles


Perhaps the core component of the game is land battles. Its here that you pit armies consisting of up to 20 units each against each other, whether they be bristling lines of musket men, artillery pieces or cavalry. Land battles give you the opportunity to show off your prowess as a General, using the terrain and the individual abilities of your men to outflank, outmanoeuvre and overpower the enemy. In total war your goal has never been to kill every last soldier: It has always been to demoralise the enemy, to force them into a rout. Tired soldiers flee much sooner then fresh soldiers, with the death of your general even your veterans may become nervous, and no one likes to be outflanked: Factors like these and many others must be taken into consideration when leading your army.

I have seen a lot doubt about the era and its weaponry: Many feel that the combat will lack the excitement seen in Rome or Medieval, where barbaric hordes of swordsmen would be replaced by relatively static musket infantry lining up to shoot each other. You needn't worry. Simply put never has Total War's combat been so much fun.

Try and envision one of my battles: I played the uppity Americans, tearfully saluting Old Glory before taking up my rifle against the goddamned Brits and their Injun allies. It was part of the “story” driven single player mode, which is basically a tutorial split up by grating cutscenes about the “courageous” American colonialists fighting the “Tyranny” of the British Empire. But ignore a English cynic. This is a good place to start as any.


Boooooooo!

Before me a host of Cherokee tribesmen were eager to steal away Old Glory, and our scalps along with it. Their force consisted of mounted gunmen, lancers, archers and a variety of infantry melee units. I was outnumbered by maybe 2 to 1, and my troops were hardly the crème de le crème: A few mediocre infantry accompanied by one unit of artillery and cavalry.

At this point its worth noting that the battle maps are at least somewhat pretty. In this instance the dramatic battle was accompanied by pounding rain falling on a small town and its nearby forest, all realistically rendered into 3D. Some might call it bland, but the level of detail on the units is very good.

Anyways the battle! I formed my army in a line, my right flank defended by a abandoned church. It is here that I used one of Empire's new features: The ability to garrison troops in destructible buildings. I placed my militia in the church, reasoning that in a melee they would flee instantly but from the building they could at least sustain fire on the enemy.

At the centre of my line I positioned my 12 pounder cannon, ready to unleash hell. The beauty of Artillery in Empire is that they can use different types of ammunition, each of which have a dramatic impact on how they can be used. Simple round shot can be whipped into the enemy from long range, but later you can also use ammunition that will explode above the enemy unleashing flames and shrapnel onto the unfortunates below.
Either side of my cannons I positioned the rest of my army. My left flank was defended by my sole unit of cavalry, strengthened at least somewhat by the line infantry nearby. Gritting my teeth I suddenly knew that I should have reinforced this town a long time ago. Too late now: If I was going to lose, I was going to take as many as the Indian's with me. Wait. Should I be calling them Native Americans? Screw it.

The Cherokee advanced their mounted gun men first, opening fire on my sole unit of cavalry as well as the infantry nearby. It as times like this I question the AI of the enemy...Why did they advance their cavalry so far ahead of their main army? Surely a combined assault with its infantry would be more effective? You might find yourself questioning the AI's decisions frequently, even on higher difficulties. And rightly so. There's still a lot of room for improvement, but I can at least say its better then previous instalments. The enemy is less likely to throw their general into a pointless kamikaze charge for a start. It is generally capable of manoeuvring its forces correctly if you try to flank them. But sieges? Don't even go there. I've never seen an AI struggle so badly. Its painful to watch. That said if you can't deal with AI, multiplayer battles are still an option, played through Total War Online. But we are all still waiting on the multiplayer Campaign mode!

After a brief struggle between my own cavalry and the mounted gun men, the enemy charged with their Lance wielding cavalry. I found myself grinning: By jingo, they've fallen for it! Clicking my nearby infantry, I selected the “form square” button. The square walls absorbed the impact of the charge before unleashing volley after volley into the reeling horsemen, obliterating the lancers. At the same time I switched my cannon ammunition to canister, cutting swathes through the infantry who were finally following behind.

Forming a square and canister shot are considered technologies, part of a new scheme which is really a twist on old Total War ideas. As part of a Campaign you now have a tech tree from which to choose general idea's, tactics and industrial improvements (as well of course, technologies!) for your nation to study at its various universities. New technologies can be unlocked by constructing certain buildings, or studying the technology that precede it in the tree. The rate at which your country studies technologies depends on the quality of your universities, the quality of the gentlemen you possess and the type of government you have. Technologies can also be stolen from other nations, by sending your gentlemen to rival universities. I will explain some of these things late, but for now back to the battle!

It did not take long to rout the cavalry, but I was defeated none the less. I barely had time to reform my infantry into a line, when they were charged by the vicious tribal warriors. Zooming the camera in close, I watched my men get cut down one by one. Here is some of the fun of Empire Total war: You can observe your soldiers up close, watching individuals circle and clash with their rivals, performing duels normally seen in Hollywood. Great stuff.

In close combat my men were hopeless outclassed, their muskets and rifles no defence against specialised melee warriors. I was beaten, but damn I had fun.

Campaign Map


I have mentioned some features of the campaign gameplay already, and really the technology tree is probably the biggest and best change from previous total war games. If you don't know what I mean by the Campaign map, its where the player moves their armies and other units across the
three theatres of India, Europe and North America, working on a turn by turn basis. You also perform diplomacy here, but I still find it too simplified. For example you can arrange alliances with other nations, but you cant encourage them to attack your enemies or even declare war with those you are already at war with. And once again the AI will make utterly irrational decisions: At one point my British Empire covered all of north America as well as large chunks of Europe, yet tiny nations would declare war on me for no reason at all. If they did it collectively, I might of called it a wise decision to counter my expansionism. But by themselves? It was just stupidity.

Other problems? The variety between the nations is a little disappointing: Many of the units are just other units with slightly different stats and names. You can argue however this comes with the era and the new tech tree. Besides, who cares when the game still has elephants?


Its not even funny how quickly I invaded France in my British Campaign.

There is also a little bit more micro management at an governmental level. You can hire and fire ministers with each minister bringing modifiers to the countries rule i.e. bonuses to tax collection or increases in public disorder. I personally found these changes rather shallow and stilted as you couldn't easily choose your new ministers, instead the potential candidate was chosen randomly by the game. You can also try and start a revolution, from say an absolute monarchy to a republic. But once again the advantages gained through changing government were just further modifiers, and it never felt like ruling as a monarchy was any different to ruling as a republic.

What else? Oh yes I have mentioned Gentlemen already: Not only can you use them to steal research, but they improve research in your own universities when present and you can even use them to initiate duels with gentlemen from other nations. If they are successful and kill the rival gentlemen, you have potentially thrown a spanner in the works of that nations modernisation.

Priests and spies are back, although spies are now called rakes and double as assassins. If you are familiar with Total war you will be comfortable with these campaign units: Rakes can sabotage buildings and kill various individuals (anything from generals to other Rakes), while priests will slowly convert the local population, harmonising its religion with your own and thus making your rule less disruptive on the local populace.

Last of all many elements of your industry take place outside a region's city: Small towns are formed when the regions population reaches a certain point, and you can choose what kind of town forms depending on your countries need: Feeling left behind in the arms race? Build a university. You also get separate options for a town formed on the coast where you have choice to build fisheries, ship yards and trade ports.

Sea Battles

Thought I'd forgotten them? Well I'll be honest, sea battles were a little disappointing. They LOOK amazing, again the detail on the ships is brilliant. And if you share my brutal love of destruction, the sight of burning, sinking or EXPLODING ships is a sight to soothe your soul. But the battles just don't feel strategical. Supposedly we are to use the direction of the wind and the various types of ammunition to defeat the enemy: You can choose from standard round shot designed to damage hulls, chain shot designed to destroy the ships rigging and mast (thus slowing or even crippling the ship) or grapeshot to target the ships crews. But really I never felt compelled to use anything else than round shot. Alternatively you can try to board and capture the enemy ships, but why you would risk this is a mystery to me, as it leaves your own ship a sitting duck in the process.


Naval battles: 'Cos chicks love Pirates of the Caribbean

You also have the option to charge up broadsides, perhaps unleashing them at close range. But when dealing with several ships, it was more practical leaving it to the AI, which for the first time actually seemed to do its job well, timing the shots very accurately. I think you are getting my point here:You are given many options, but no real incentive to pursue them. After awhile I just automated all of these battles because they were slow and generally unfun. They certainly had nothing on the land battles.

Conclusion


Is this the best Total War game yet? Yes. Is it the most revolutionary? No. I think that title goes to Rome, and perhaps that was the biggest problem for me. I really wanted to see massive improvements to the AI, I really wanted to be blown away by the naval battles and I really wanted multiplayer Campaigns. At least we can say the latter is coming, along with a few much needed stability patches, but other then that we were only given relatively small improvements to long-time critical issues....But its still a good game. And if you like Total War, or you have never tried Total War but you're looking for somewhere to start, look no further.



75/100 With a possible +10 if Multiplayer Campaigns are good enough. Seriously that shit could be awesome.

Edited by The Colonel, 06 August 2009 - 09:36 PM.


#2
Plasmic Fury

Plasmic Fury

    Best Game Reviewer 08 & 09 | Best Console Contributor '0

  • Members
  • 5,912 posts
  • xfire:Plasmic Fury
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greater Toronto Area
  • Xbox / GFWL:Plasmic Fury
  • PSN:Too much $$$
  • Wii:Piece of Shit
  • Rofl-Rupees:3
Let me start by saying I am quite impressed with the level of effort put into this review.

You have a nice level of personality added into your reviews which makes the readability feel loose but pleasant at the same time (so it's a good thing).

The beginning of your review threw me off though. You just talked about a battle that you fought - which is entertaining but not all that informative. Yes, you threw in some nice points in the middle of it, but it seemed less of a review and more like a blog/journal update at the beginning. You got right down to the damn point though after, which I enjoyed.

Ultimately, you explored many aspects of the game and covered your opinion of good and bad in a straight fashioned way with a pinch of personality. For this being your first review you really blew me out of the water, like I said before there was some excellent effort put in here!

Thanks for participating, reviews like this make this contest worth doing.

GJ

#3
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
Thank you! Yeah I worried I might of spoken of that battle a bit too much but eh it made the review a little bit more enjoyable for me to write. Cheers for the feedback.

#4
The Colonel

The Colonel

    The Ghost of Christmas Past

  • Retired Staff
  • 7,150 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Noone knows
  • Rofl-Rupees:5
I give this review a 1 out of 10 for the "Boooooooo" at America.

Edited by The Colonel, 16 April 2009 - 10:57 PM.

And like that, he was gone.

#5
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
QUOTE (The Colonel @ Apr 17 2009, 04:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I give this review a 1 out of 10 for the "Boooooooo" at America.


sadface

#6
Bl!ndf!re

Bl!ndf!re
  • Members
  • 1,217 posts
  • xfire:tehlickerer
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR
  • Rofl-Rupees:2
"Try and envision one of my battles: I played the uppity Americans, tearfully saluting Old Glory before taking up my rifle against the goddamned Brits and their Injun allies. It was part of the “story” driven single player mode, which is basically a tutorial split up by grating cutscenes about the “courageous” American colonialists fighting the “Tyranny” of the British Empire. But ignore a English cynic. This is a good place to start as any."

I loved this part, its so true the Americas were the best treated colony in the British Empire, with lower taxes than england itself.

Awesome review, I'm considering picking it up but i don't know whether my comp will be able to handle it, can you compare your specs to mine and tell me how it ran on yours?

2.4 Ghz
9600 GT nVidia
4 Gigs of Ram
320 gbs of memory


QUOTE (Husky @ Mar 31 2010, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A couple of Mutas softened up to the red, a couple of other Mutas softened up to the black, cause they're dead.

QUOTE (slartibartfast of earth @ Sep 28 2010, 08:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ps my disablity in my hands makes my typing crap sry

QUOTE (PwnDaddy123 @ Mar 31 2010, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'd hit it tbh. Especially if it's dead.

#7
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
Thanks for the feedback.

I have:

Duo core 3.16 GHz
nVidia 9800GT
2Gb Ram

And it ran smoothely on the highest graphical settings. I'm not an expert but your specs sound like they'll do the job well enough.

#8
Dumpes

Dumpes
  • GA Private
  • 2 posts
  • xfire:dmpes
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Manhasset NY
  • Interests:Hockey<br />New York Rangers<br />i like a lot of things
  • Steam ID:Dumpes
  • Xbox / GFWL:Maj Dumpes
  • Gamer Army ID:1051
I love this game
it runs OK on my laptop but on the main computer at my house it runs very well

and i love the total war series

#9
Lt ledhead

Lt ledhead
  • Members
  • 2,629 posts
  • xfire:ledhead93
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Freddy beach, New-Brunswick
  • Xbox / GFWL:Lt ledhead
  • Rofl-Rupees:1
Nice review, still trying to get a copy of this game

#10
Kanashe

Kanashe
  • Members
  • 306 posts
  • xfire:hamio
Very nice review. But I hope I can put in something. For once the AI is very terrible at both sides even at the friendly one, since I sometimes had guys not doing shit, or even doing stupid stuff like walking in enemy gunfire, not using cover, or not even returning fire. I mean just like a simple logical thing like when your shot at, shoot back also I had moments that I could draw enemies in to choke points, even though I was outnumbered. Then there's like the frequent crashes to desktop. I don't know if ya had 'em, but for me the game crashed alot, speacylly when I took over a town and wanted to finish the seige battle being in control of it



#11
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
The a.i. of individual units was a bit iffy at times, but I reckon that wont be too hard to improve with patches. For example in medieval 2, without patches, your cavalry would just walk into the enemy, not charge. They fixed it eventually though, thank god.

As for crashes, well again they will patch that and I did mention these stability patches were much needed.

Thanks for the feedback!

edit infact they have released an update:

http://blogs.sega.co...te-12-released/

Edited by Master C, 06 May 2009 - 01:30 PM.


#12
Kazzerax

Kazzerax

    FUCK!

  • Retired Staff
  • 4,859 posts
  • xfire:kazzerax
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:de_train
  • Interests:Counter-Strike, Chess, computer hardware, music, literature, film and philosophy.
  • Steam ID:kazzerax
  • Gamer Army ID:764
I don't think the battle part of the review was in ANY way a negative. I don't just want a list of pros and cons, I want to get as close to playing the game as possible. If you can make me feel like I'm next to you watching you play in your review you did a great job, and you did just that.
QUOTE
Kazzerax
MOTHERFUCKING ENTITY OF THE WORLD
A PORTION OF GLORIOUS THOUGHT
ELECTRICITY SHAPED TO REASON
FORGED THROUGH THE FIRES OF LIFE
BROUGHT TO BEAR ON CHAOS TO IMPOSE WILL UPON AN UNCARING AND INDIFFERENT UNIVERSE
TO FORGE FROM NOTHING, SOMETHING
Beautiful

#13
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
edit fuck you martin (my housemate).

Edited by Master C, 29 May 2009 - 06:26 PM.


#14
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
QUOTE (Master C @ May 30 2009, 12:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
edit fuck you martin (my housemate).



#15
Fryslagg

Fryslagg
  • GA Private
  • 729 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sweden
  • Gamer Army ID:852
Great review, you capture the single player side of the game perfectly. Add pictures and this review could be published in a gaming magazine. icon_smile.gif
Hakkaa päälle

#16
CommunityGamer

CommunityGamer
  • Members
  • 4 posts
  • Gender:Male
Great Review! I am a big fan of the "Total War" games!

#17
Hades.

Hades.
  • GA Private
  • 4,189 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edmonton Alberta Canada
  • Interests:Holy fuck Ive been on these forums for a long time. They pretty much raised me tbh
  • Xbox / GFWL:Undisclosed
  • Wii:Don't want.
  • Gamer Army ID:4225
  • Company:Alpha
Rome total war was fun ill have to give this one a try too thanks!

79577008.png


#18
Alexc26

Alexc26
  • GA Private
  • 2,082 posts
  • xfire:Alexc26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Steam ID:Alexc26
  • Xbox / GFWL:Alexc26
  • PSN:Alexc26
  • Rofl-Rupees:13
  • Gamer Army ID:4614
  • Company:Gamma
Good Review, i bought this game a few days ago, and its the only game i have been playing since then, i thik its a really fun game, although it does lag for me a lil bit in some sea battles or land battles, but thats just cause of my GFX card, im now gunna stop posting, so i can go on ETW right now icon_smile.gif

#19
Master C

Master C
  • Members
  • 5,512 posts
  • xfire:masterca
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England
  • Xbox / GFWL:Renegade Con
  • Wii:4710238335790963
  • Rofl-Rupees:7
Cheers for the positive feedback all.

Tempted to have a crack at Chrono Trigger next (hence the avatar of a fat Frog). If only I could overcome my lazyness...

Edited by Master C, 28 June 2009 - 05:06 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users