Next to USA, which country is second?
Welcome to The OFFICIAL Pure Pwnage forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
World Power
Started by
shrimpy
, May 01 2008 05:46 PM
#1
Posted 01 May 2008 - 05:46 PM
"A Loser may be pathetic, but doesn't quit because he is pathetic"
removed image from sig. Please read the forum rules on sig size.-ThE_MarD
removed image from sig. Please read the forum rules on sig size.-ThE_MarD
#2
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:00 PM
china inf
#3
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:18 PM
QUOTE (confrico @ May 2 2008, 08:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
china inf
isn't that for noobs? LOL i had to say it
It's not what's gotten into me, it's what's gotten into Oprah, my seed, son! I'm rich, bitch! - Dave Chappelle
#4
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:34 PM
Depends what you determine as 'power'.
Is power a strong economy? Military might? Compete domination of the population? Ability to destroy the planet many times over?
If your going for military might, then probably China just for the sheer fact that there's an assload of 'em. Maybe Russia if were fighting dirty and using nuclear weapons.
Is power a strong economy? Military might? Compete domination of the population? Ability to destroy the planet many times over?
If your going for military might, then probably China just for the sheer fact that there's an assload of 'em. Maybe Russia if were fighting dirty and using nuclear weapons.
#5
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:48 PM
Moving To Debate -SN3S

QUOTE (Joby @ May 3 2008, 08:13 PM)
We need to find you a girl that doesn't end in .jpeg
#6
Posted 01 May 2008 - 07:19 PM
#7
Posted 01 May 2008 - 09:42 PM
#8
Posted 02 May 2008 - 04:51 PM
QUOTE (TubularLuggage @ May 1 2008, 10:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Canada. We're just laying low for a while. You'll see.
he's right...look the fuck out
#9
Posted 02 May 2008 - 06:07 PM
#10
Posted 03 May 2008 - 03:32 AM
QUOTE (shrimpy @ May 2 2008, 10:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Next to USA, which country is second?
define how a country has power over the another country?
#11
Posted 03 May 2008 - 03:34 AM
QUOTE (Pawnator @ May 3 2008, 11:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
China.
And, technically, Saudi Arabia.
And, technically, Saudi Arabia.
why saudi arabia?
#12
Posted 03 May 2008 - 03:36 AM
QUOTE (xgunwingx @ May 2 2008, 11:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
isn't that for noobs? LOL i had to say it
ecominically . human wright
#13
Posted 03 May 2008 - 03:41 AM
QUOTE (shrimpy @ May 2 2008, 10:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Next to USA, which country is second?
usa
#14
Posted 03 May 2008 - 03:54 AM
Everyones dead cept Australia.
Fuckin kangaroos....
Fuckin kangaroos....


QUOTE (Master C @ Feb 16 2008, 10:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If a girl ever tells a you what to do, regardless of the circumstances, you should totally back hand her across the face.
Just to remind her of her place.
Just to remind her of her place.
#15
Posted 03 May 2008 - 05:23 PM
QUOTE (moor w rot @ May 3 2008, 05:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
usa
why? i dont see it they seem to be struggling at thhe moment that why the are in iraq to steel oil . then they will have power . it is the most want product. if they had more they get levrage.
If oil were the biggest decider of who has more global sway, Canada would be right at the top of the list. We're one of the largest producers of oil in the world. We're also living proof that oil isn't everything.
#16
Posted 04 May 2008 - 09:15 PM
Actually in terms of economy, government, education, military, etc...
"A Loser may be pathetic, but doesn't quit because he is pathetic"
removed image from sig. Please read the forum rules on sig size.-ThE_MarD
removed image from sig. Please read the forum rules on sig size.-ThE_MarD
#17
Posted 04 May 2008 - 09:43 PM
heh, seems to be basically USA Air vs China inf.. hour =D
#18
Posted 05 May 2008 - 02:29 PM
QUOTE (moor w rot @ May 3 2008, 03:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
usa
why? i dont see it they seem to be struggling at thhe moment that why the are in iraq to steel oil . then they will have power . it is the most want product. if they had more they get levrage.
We not only steal oil but we steal spelling and grammar also.
I say China.
Midwest Gaming - Work in progress.
#19
Posted 06 May 2008 - 09:49 AM
QUOTE (TubularLuggage @ May 3 2008, 05:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If oil were the biggest decider of who has more global sway, Canada would be right at the top of the list. We're one of the largest producers of oil in the world. We're also living proof that oil isn't everything.
USA has large amounts of oil also, we just horde it all and go after other countries supplies just to horde up moar oil just so we can make maximum profit off of our citizens. ALL YOUR OIL ARE BELONG TO US!!!
#20
Posted 06 May 2008 - 10:58 AM
QUOTE (Neeros @ May 6 2008, 09:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
USA has large amounts of oil also, we just horde it all and go after other countries supplies just to horde up moar oil just so we can make maximum profit off of our citizens. ALL YOUR OIL ARE BELONG TO US!!! 
The Rocky Mountains is sitting on top of 800 billion barrels of oil. There's more there than any other reserve in the world
However, from wiki:
QUOTE
The United States has the largest known deposits of oil shale in the world, according to the Bureau of Land Management and holds an estimated 2,500 gigabarrels of potentially recoverable oil, enough to meet U.S. demand for oil at current rates for 110 years. However, oil shale does not actually contain oil, but a waxy oil precursor known as kerogen. For this reason and because there is not yet any significant commercial production of oil from oil shale in the United States as of 2008, its oil shale reserves do not meet the petroleum industry definition of proven oil reserves.
Also:
QUOTE
In April 2008, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) released a report giving a new resource assessment of the Bakken Formation underlying portions of Montana and North Dakota. The USGS believes that with new horizontal drilling technology there is somewhere between 3.0 billion barrels (480,000,000 m³) to 4.5 billion barrels (720,000,000 m³) of recoverable oil remaining to be discovered in this 200,000 square miles (520,000 km²) formation that was initially discovered in 1951. If accurate, this reassessment would make it the largest continuous oil formation ever discovered in the U.S.[45] However, it would represent only a five to seven month supply of oil for the United States at current (2007) rates of consumption.
We have a lot of oil, if only we started to utilize some of our technology to heat up the Rocky Mountain oil shale and extract it.
Midwest Gaming - Work in progress.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account

Back to top










