Well you made some spelling mistakes in the other stickies, but that isn't really important
I already talked about this before, and the rules were changed a bit but I'm still not too fond of them:
"1. If you have a post count of under 5, just for quality assurance, please submit your review to be looked over by one of the mods of the section, or have 3 people vouch for you. We don't want to hinder your creativity, we just want to insure a good quality post. icon_smile.gif We also reserve the right, as mods, to delete any reviews deemed inappropriate, controversial, or horribly written in general.
So keep it clean and keep it well done, alright?
3. Please provide a summary of 1 or more sites along with the link showing the site's score on the game. Yes, we'd rather like to hear your review more so than another site's, but if someone is saying a game like my pretty pony adventure is the world's best game and every site gave it a 0, well... it just gives some of the people who are reading the forum a reference to see other opinions if they so choose so."
Well, for #1 I'm not sure if that's a typo (you said people shouldn't do a review with a post count under 5), and maybe you meant 50? I'm kind of starting to lean towards that people should have a bit of experience on the forums just so they kind of know how things are done here, maybe like 100 posts. 5 is kind of silly, it may as well be 0.
Concerning #3 again I kind of think the point is that you want people's opinion from this community, and not some other site. Although I guess I can understand if it's a game nobody has like heard of and the person reviewing it is very biased, it may be good to hear somebody's opinion that's a bit more credible. So I guess that posting another site isn't too