Just to ask, you're presuming this why? None of the videos have been released. As somebody who actually saw the impact hole, I can't agree with you about the plane hitting the ground before it struck the Pentagon.
The problem with cell phones on airliners is the FCC, not the FAA. The range is certainly long enough (I mean, you easily get service 6 miles away on the ground with things inbetween you and the tower, don't you?), but their concern is BILLING, since you'd be hitting multiple towers at the same time.
I really suggest you read this thread. Yeah, it's kinda long. However, you'll find some disputes between Anaxandrides, st1dinoh, and myself which bring up a lot of things which aren't in Loose Change or anything else.
Too bad those are now classified. There are a few images of it from the thread I linked earlier, though.
Why would they bother killing the man who made it? Everyone dismisses him as a nutjob. Killing him would simply validate it.
Yes, it loses some strength. You can see reports from NIST and the NSF in the previous thread (which I linked), as well as some other engineering analysis. It's easy to sit in your chair and say "well, steel loses strength" blah blah, but metallurgical and engineering analysis simply does not agree with that hypothesis.
With the bombs who knows a terrorist could have planted the bombs who says its the government WTF OMFG!
They said the fire was orange but not the inside....jet fuel burns insanely
The HEATER DOES NOT USE JET FUEL OR IT WOULD MELT MY DAD TRIED TO PUT JETFUEL IN A ZIPPO AND IT MELTED.
Edit: Now i have added 3 things so now i will keep editing it to show mistakes.
Edit Later on: This is actually really strange...I am not sure what to belive I want to think that the governments is not evil but i cant help but think that it is dodgy!
Not to knock your father, but... Is he a metallurgist, structural engineer, or mechanical engineer? If not, then... Believe me, this has been thoroughly tested long before 9/11, and no, jet fuel does not burn through steel.