You're back

I believe in like, some fat ol' axe following me around, I better not blink 5 times in a minute of else it will chop me up good like. Now, I have no proof either way (the axe is invisable and undecteable, apart from in the minds of the faithful i.e. me) but it's better to believe in teh great axe just in case, yknow. If it doens't chop me before the end of my life then like, I have infinte pleasure or w/e. Yeassss.
You don't need evidence against my axe to know its utter bullshit do you? Lack of disproof does balance out the lack of proof. Your the one making the claim, the onus of proof is on you.
I know it's not directly relevant to the debate at hand, but your belief in your axe is extremely easily tested. Blink 6 times in a row, but yeah, anyway. I won't use that as the basis for my argument, because we both know that's totally irrelevant

I'm not saying religion doesn't make sense, logically, but I am saying it can't ever be proved 100%. Faith *has* to be a part of the Christian, and probably most other (although I'm less educated), religions. If the Christian religion was ever proved to be true, I'd instantly try and disprove it's existence, haha, because without faith, the freely chosen service of God is totally non-existant, and the religion would lose a major aspect as far as I'm concerned. It's illogical to think that God would allow his existance to be proved - and as gay as that sounds as a debate point, it makes sense. It's not proof or evidence or anything close to it - don't get me wrong - but it serves as a reason to expect not to find any evidence, from my point of view. The fact that faith is involved inherently in religion is making debating it pretty difficult - because I'll never be able to give you concrete, 100% confirmed evidence. That doesn't bother me, but I have a feeling it might bother you XD
As far as I'm concerned, nobody really came up with an adequate explanation of the disappearance of Jesus' body from the tomb, so there's some evidence to start us off. Not concrete evidence, but I wouldn't expect it to be

QUOTE
Of course, demanding proof is simply "one dimensional". There are other forms of "proof" bar the scienctific. Of course, I can't explain them to you because that would require the use of scientific logic, which doesn't work for my mystical faith and proof. I can't really explain them to myself, because, y'know, for me to understand these unknown proofs my brain would have to work in another way to everyone elses. Oh wait, we don't even know that everyones brain works in a different way, because logic doesn't work for detecting "other ways"!
I don't think anyone here is arguing like that...
I don't like how you've said scientific logic though - as far as I'm concerned, science is a method we use to gather evidence from the evidence, suggest theories. Logic can be argued without any evidence whatsoever. I think religion stands up to logical arguments, but science isn't useful when discussing theology, for the most part. I mean, for example, the science of the beginning and end of the universe is relevant, but looking for God with a telescope or whatever isn't going to be useful.

Which brings us on to your next point...
QUOTE
Your arguments as follows are simply wrong man!
God is beyond science because I said so.
Do not attempt to discredit that God is beyond science/logic because God is beyond science so cannot be discredited by science/logic.
They are simply circular. You make an assumption based on literally, nothing "God is beyond science cause, well, in the bible it says he is". and then use that unfounded assumption to justify every claim you make; "Do not attempt to use logic when concerned with God! God is beyond logic!". You even try and back up your orginal assumption (God is beyond science) with itself; "Do not try and prove God is beyond science or not because God is beyond science so you cannot prove it".
It's not based on the Bible or doctrine - it's based on logic. If you've made the leap of faith and decided to believe in God, then you've made the decision to believe in a God which is beyond the physical realm. It's an assumption, yes, that he's not in the physical realm, and that, indeed, there's another realm in which he lives

But religion is based upon assumptions... assumptions with some good evidence, but not conclusive evidence...
QUOTE
Its deceptivily circular. You might occasionally throw in the odd bone to Atheists in the form of supposed "evidence for God" - Although never quite stepping out of the saftely barrier that is the circular "God is beyond logic/science/thinking/feeling/everything you can come up with to argue about him with".
I disagree. I've been pretty frank with you in this post, and there's no motivation for me to stand up against a crushing argument from your side and believe in a God despite the evidence. I have to weigh everything up, because I don't want to believe in a God that doesn't exist

Its hard to argue with it, because so much of it is personal. Not just in the potential fake, mental 'personal' sense, but it relies on things I've seen, but you won't believe that I've seen

For example : speaking to John Berry, a minister of a church near mine, who had been visiting Zambia (iirc, but unimportant for the story), where he visited a church which met on a mountain. Hundreds of people were coming from all around, from all the nearby villages, it sounds impressive to be honest, being on top of this mountain and seeing all these tiny dots flocking towards you from miles away. Irrelevant, but cool. Anyway, half way through the service, some guy fell down. Some of the congregation who were doctors confirmed the guy didn't have a pulse and wasn't breathing. The elders of the church gathered round, laid on hands and the guy got up, and the service continued, after thanking God, but no big thing was made of it. It turns out it's not a completely uncommon occurence at this church - I don't have figures for you - but apparently the elders really weren't phased.
Now, we've got a few choices to explain this. The incompetence of the doctors/wanting to not feel a pulse (although you would have thought they would prefer the guy to be alive before they prayed for him), my friend the minister is making it up, or it's a miracle. I'm sure most will jump for the first option, a few for the second, and the theists obviously for the third. I would say it's possible, but unlikely, that the doctors at this church couldn't take pulses correctly, and the fact it had happened before could either mean that the doctors were being repeatedly crap, or that miracles were repeatedly taking place. That, on its own, won't convert anyone, but I trust the guy who told it to me, and I don't think it's illogical to believe the doctors were able to take pulses. "It's more likely than a God existing" is the obvious reply, but I'm not sure it is, when you stack up the other evidence.
At a Christian festival I went to two years back, a girl who had suffered from a serious allergy to a protein found in many things, including types of rubber and all fruit, was prayed for, and claimed to feel a "weight lifting from her", and was so confident, she went up and ate an apple on the stage where the band were. (Medical records etc. were confirmed - she wasn't making it up) Two choices : miracle, or her belief was so strong that her body did some unexplained thing and healed itself (as an afterthought, I might be lying XD not an option for me though

). I could go on, but these all mount up. Explainable miracles - but every time one happens, one explanation changes, whereas the other is different each time (if you get what I mean). So looking at it mathematically, the chance that God exists has a figure, I don't know what it is, some finite figure. Let's say you're 99% sure that God doesn't exist - so 0.01 is the chance God exists. (It's arbitrary, please don't assault me for it being too high ¬_¬) Now, let's say that the doctors being incompetent repeatedly has a chance of 0.5, and that the chance of the girl's body healing itself is 0.2. It's therefore a 0.1 chance that the girl's body healed itself and the doctors were incompetent, as they are independent events. There are countless miracles witnessed, but I would say that to explain away all the miracles that I've witnessed would require incredible chance - and that's just counting the ones I've personally witnessed. Do you sort of see what I mean? I'm a mathematician, so that's why it's written like this, but yeah. (Note to non mathematicians, 0 is impossible, 1 is certain and 0.5 is 50/50 chance

)
Anyway, I'll stop there. I have a feeling this post is probably very big