could very well be, I'll check out the book he was reading when i get home. But, they had alot of the stories such as Noah and the Ark and Adam and Eve and all that.
You are referring to both Zoroastrianism and Mithraism respectively. Technically this specifically is Mithraism, but most of their followers believed their original prophet to be Zoroaster, which links the two. Zoroastrianism is a Middle Eastern religion for reference, however, and is the other monotheistic religion that in some scholar's opinions predates Judaism. However, according to popular belief, neither of the two religions go any further back than 600 BC.
C.S Lewis REALLY should of known better. Anyway, it would be foolish to engage in famous figure quote war with Atheists, we have essentially every renowned intellectual since 1850
. Since when would anyone *want* to be an atheist? Personally, I would rather be a Christian, much more comforting, but it doesn't make sense to me.
On a side note, I can't believe that 90 percent of "religious" people actually believe. Seriously, if I knew that heaven was just around the corner, and really belived it, I could *never* be unhappy. I get excited enough about the weekend, knowing that I would be in paradise in a heartbeat. I don't know how I could ever be unhappy.
Secondly, I would likely be happy for someone when they died.
Honestly, I know how you feel, and I understand where you are coming from. I just wanted to put up an article that talks about atheists from what should be the Christian perspective which was written by a Christian intellectual:
QUOTE (Martin Zender)
ATHEISTS IN THE RAIN
There was the church sign: ATHEISTS HAVE NO INVISIBLE MEANS OF SUPPORT.
I didnít like it; I knew it was wrong. No invisible means of support? Then what powers the atheists? Their own strength? The devil? I would not give either the atheist or the devil that kind of credit. Only the spirit of God causes anything to live and move. Satan canít create life, and neither can he sustain it; all is out of God. The creature certainly cannot will itself into life, or sustain its life day by day.
Scripture says that God causes the rain to fall on the just and the unjust alike. Rain, in biblical days, was a great blessing. In an arid land so dependent on agriculture, rain was life. The presence of it even reflected, to the people, the presence of God.
"He causes His sun to rise on the wicked and the good, and He makes it rain on the just and the unjust. For if ever you should love those who are loving you, what wages have you?" (Mt. 5:45-46).
The apostle Paul testified to this truth as well. Before the philosophers and intellectuals and atheists at Marís Hill, Paul said, "In Him, we are living and moving and are" (Acts 17:28). Thatís a big "we" there, and it illustrates a grand truth: even atheists are somehow moving in Christ.
But the church sign knew nothing of this monumental truth because the pastor who erected it loved cleverness more than truth. No invisible means of support. Get it? Ha, ha. Good one. If the goal of the pastor was a clever saying, then the pastor succeeded and my writing is presumptuous. But if the words were meant to reflect Scriptural truth, then the pastor tumbles into the abyss of human ignorance.
The first dictionary definition of "support" is "to bear or hold up, to sustain." We read in Romans 11:36 that "of Him and through Him and to Him are all things." This verse is even better in the Amplified version: "All things originate with Him and come from Him; all things live through Him, and all things center in and tend to consummate and to end in Him."
The part of the verse I want to emphasize is: "All things live through Him." God sustains all creation. Nothing that lives, lives apart from Him. What keeps atheists alive? Their own wickedness? The devil? Neither. God keeps atheists alive, for "all things live through Him." Even at the cross, Christ gave breath to the very soldiers who cursed Him. Such is grace.
Let us never become exclusive by imagining ourselves the only recipients of grace. Either God sustains and supports atheists, or someone else does. Either God sustains and supports atheists, or grace fails. How could grace include everyone but them without losing its essential meaning? How could God tell mortal men, "Love your enemies" if He, Himself, is incapable of doing the same?
Job 8:20 says, "Behold, God will not support evil doers." But who said that? It was Bildad, the Shuhite, one of Jobís so-called friends. But what does God say of the sayings of Bildad? Job 42:7- "The Lord said to Eliphaz the Temanite, ĎMy wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for YE HAVE NOT SPOKEN OF ME THE THING THAT IS RIGHT." God would say the same thing to the fashioner of the terrible church sign. I wonder if they know that their doctrine is that of Bildad?
So we rightly conclude that God supports evildoers. But then the question arises: Why does He do that? Because, as with Pharaoh, doers of evil help fulfill Godís purpose.
Proverbs 16:4- "The Lord hath made all things for Himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil."
Isaiah 54:16- "I have created the waster to destroy."
Romans 9:17- "For the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh, even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might show my power in thee."
Another dictionary definition of support is "maintenance, as of a person or family." One way God raises up His pharaohs and keeps them there is by supporting them physically. Thus, "He maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust, for if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye?" (Mt. 5:46).
Obviously, then, God loves and supports atheists. Why did the sign contradict that truth? (Hint: it was a church sign.)
Another definition of support, and I quote directly from the Random House Collegiate dictionary: "To endure with patience." Startling it will be for some to learn that these are the exact words Paul uses concerning the wicked in Romans 9:22. From the New American Standard Bible: "What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction?"
But according to this church sign, God endures (or supports) them not.
As for atheists, they are no different than we once were. We came to God, not of our own initiative, but because of Christís spirit. We came because He first loved and called us (1 Jn. 4:10, Jn. 6:44). He will one day call atheists, too, because His love is the selfless kind that does not rest until it seeks and saves the last lost sheep (Mt. 18:12, 1Tim. 1:15, Is. 45:23, 1Cor. 15:25). The blood of Christís cross is the most effective prescription for all enmity, either on earth or in heaven (Col. 1:20).
Remember, "God locks up all in stubbornness that He should be merciful to all" (Rom. 11:32).
Let Scriptural truth, not clever phraseology, guide our church sign erectors, not that I have any real hope of this happening. It will never happen in this eonóunless, that is, I start a church. Now thereís an idea. The message on my church sign would teem with life and Scriptural truth. My message would stop people in their tracks (or in their cars), and probably cause several accidents. It would be a message so simple, so true, so resplendent with the wisdom, grace and mercy of God, that none but the scripturally ignorant and proud of heart would attempt to refute it. My church sign would read:
GOD LOVES ATHEISTS, TOO.