Depends what sort of evidence we're talking about. Actually studying, for example, the life of Jesus, gives ample evidence that he was more than just a man. If you look for evidence of anything in science, you won't actually find it. I can't really back these up here (wouldn't want to take up the whole page ), I'd be happy to, however, if you want me to PM them to you or something. For the first, Hume, although he was an athiest, came up with a theory that nobody has been able to disprove, that we cannot rationally believe anything science teaches us... for the second point, for example, an athiest looking to disprove Christianity started to write a book, studying the life of Jesus in depth. In writing this book, he found overwhelming evidence for Christianity, and converted. He still published the book though The book is Who Moved The Stone?, by Frank Morrison.
This is stupid, most scholars agree that the story of Jesus is mostly made up, what we do know about Jesus is that he was a man named Yeshua that pretty much started to incite a riot against the Romans, yet we still do not even know if this is true as no Roman records actually mention this, and Roman records mention EVERYTHING, also all jewish Records were destroied duirng the Riot.
Science doesn't solve that mystery any better than religion. In my opinion, religion actually solves it better. It makes more sense to me for God to have existed forever, not dependant on the universe, than to say the big bang sprung out from nowhere.
Yes because a giant man with swords flying out of his mouth and has 7 feet and fire hair making the universe makes more sense than the universe being created after the energy resulting after 2 membraines crashed into eachover
Why? Many of the top scientists are either religious or support religious orientation. There is no evidence to show that religion opposes scientific advances. Some religions do not believe in medicine, but these are restricted to very few.
Actually most are athiest, Only mathamaticians are kinda religious because with Math you can prove ANYTHING, 40% of mathamaticians belive in a god.
Again, no evidence to support this. Also science will never be able to prove the creation of the world because there is only circumstantial evidence to support the theories. As no one was alive then, we shall never know for sure.
Science can find overwhelming proof how the world was created though, which Religion cannot.
It's not exactly normal, but it's not impossible. People's average life span could have followed a curve, going from very high, to lower, to a minimum, and now it's increasing, with advances in medicine. Changes in the human genome could have potentially meant humans live much shorter lives now than they used to. I can't back it up, but as far as I know, you can't disprove it either
yes you can, Genetics would show that people 5000 years ago lived to 900 years old, hell skeletons would as well, these days humans live longer than they ever have, 10,000-2000 years ago you would be lucky to hit 30.
Anyway Stop compairing Science to Religion, its stupid, they are completley different, Science finds proof to answers and accepts change, Religon is like "How was my hamburger made" "God did it" "Ohh... how does my car work?" "God does it", Relgion offers an excuse as an answer, Really Religion is just filler material till science proves what really happened.