Stop being such an ignorant twat Cakecom.
Stop being a whiny bitch way2lazy2care.
This is way, WAY too short for a Battlefield 4. There's literally NO POINT.
If it was a total change in setting (like the difference between BF1942, BF:Vietnam and BF2 had) then kk it's cool. There's a reason to have a short distance of time between release dates- people want variety in their games. That's why nobody complained about Battlefield Vietnam coming out 2 years after 1942 and then BF2 doing the same. Because all 3 games had totally different settings + gameplay mechanics.
But if Battlefield 4 is going to be the direct sequel to Battlefield 3 in the same way Battlefield 3 was the direct sequel to BF2, then there is no point. There's no way the technology they have is much better (Frostbite 2 was made with the NEXT generation of consoles in mind, so I highly doubt the technology is much different) and nobody liked the singleplayer. Anything that can/would be balanced in the next game could have that effort put into a BF3 expansion and sold in a few months.
They still haven't even delivered on promises directly given to the Battlefield 3 community like the Battlerecorder.
Fuck DICE and fuck EA.
Also, it's not that Bad Company and Bad Company 2 are bad games. I just never tried them, and never will try any of the games in that series.