97 replies to this topic

[Maxorhead666]

Anti-Tank dog

That is one of the funniest, yet saddest, true things I have ever seen.

[CakeCom]

That is one of the funniest, yet saddest, true things I have ever seen.

[Yozki]

Six exploded upon returning to the Soviet trenches, killing and injuring soldiers

Another serious training mistake was later revealed; the Soviets used their own diesel-engine tanks to train the dogs rather than German tanks which had gasoline engines.[5] As the dogs relied on their acute sense of smell, the dogs sought out familiar Soviet tanks instead of strange-smelling German tanks.[7]

[Andrack]

Anti-Tank dog

[spiri7ussancti]

If we wanted realism then the multiplayer would consist of america going in with unlimited air support.

While this exploding dog thing looks retarded, (as if dogs weren't powerful enough already) I've always said that realism makes games really fucking boring.

[CakeCom]

If we wanted realism then the multiplayer would consist of america going in with unlimited air support.

While this exploding dog thing looks retarded, (as if dogs weren't powerful enough already) I've always said that realism makes games really fucking boring.

Exactly.

But question- why the fuck wouldn't they just keep using the explodable RC cars? Just make them bigger?

Like a RC Monster Truck or something that moves slow and is armed with explosives... it'd still work.

I dunno I just have something against using animals like that, even in a video game. I'm not usually the moral fag in situations like this but I mean I just don't think it's right.

[Maxorhead666]

Exactly.

But question- why the fuck wouldn't they just keep using the explodable RC cars? Just make them bigger?

Like a RC Monster Truck or something that moves slow and is armed with explosives... it'd still work.

I dunno I just have something against using animals like that, even in a video game. I'm not usually the moral fag in situations like this but I mean I just don't think it's right.

I'm gonna have to agree. Also, reusing stuff is getting old for COD. Something new maybe? Like dudes on motorbikes, or a car, or a tank at higher levels?

[spiri7ussancti]

Exactly.

*GASP

But question- why the fuck wouldn't they just keep using the explodable RC cars? Just make them bigger?

Like a RC Monster Truck or something that moves slow and is armed with explosives... it'd still work.

I dunno I just have something against using animals like that, even in a video game. I'm not usually the moral fag in situations like this but I mean I just don't think it's right.

It's a video game, so i really don't care about the moral implications. I realize it's not nearly as artistic, but what if people had the same attitude about killing the little girls in bioshock, not the perfect comparison i'll admit that, but.....

I'm gonna have to agree. Also, reusing stuff is getting old for COD. Something new maybe? Like dudes on motorbikes, or a car, or a tank at higher levels?

All of those actually sound fucking awesome.

[otaku_4_life]

I dunno I just have something against using animals like that, even in a video game.

Wat. But you don't have problems with humans being riddled with bullets?

Edited by otaku_4_life, 17 August 2011 - 12:43 AM.

[Skul1Candy]

Anti-Tank dogs, seriously? fucking AWESOME and also disgustingly sad.

but, in terms of MW3, of course I will buy it, it looks fun enough but attack dogs in black ops by themselves was almost enough overkill to make me hate the game occasionally.

I am annoyed though, I want more time to play each multiplayer game before everyone moves on to the next. not made of money and I guess I just don't play enough to get bored of it fast enough,
I had high hopes of reaching prestige 13, but its not gonna happen now

[Utttand4]

But question- why the fuck wouldn't they just keep using the explodable RC cars? Just make them bigger?

Like a RC Monster Truck or something that moves slow and is armed with explosives... it'd still work.

If they did that, then Gamespot, IGN, and all other mainstream reviewers wont have an excuse to call MW3 a revolutionary, game-changing, genre-defining, modern, pioneering, innovative, ground-breaking work of genius.

A friend who playtested MW3 told me it was a lot like MW2, im gonna give this shitpile a miss.

[spiri7ussancti]

A friend who playtested MW3 told me it was a lot like MW2,

Really?...that gives me a little hope. Although from what I've seen of the game i'm sure he must be mistaken. A lot of people who didn't play it long enough have this mixed up idea of what the game is like. I'm pretty sure that's teh case....BUT THERE'S HOPE.

Now I'm having mixed emotions.

[CakeCom]

Wat. But you don't have problems with humans being riddled with bullets?

Not unless it's used in bad taste.

The reason being that humans aren't defenseless.

and the dogs are being used as suicide bombs.

[otaku_4_life]

Not unless it's used in bad taste.

The reason being that humans aren't defenseless.

and the dogs are being used as suicide bombs.

I'm pretty sure there's never a situation in which humans killing eachother is ever in good taste.

[CakeCom]

I'm pretty sure there's never a situation in which humans killing eachother is ever in good taste.

Well when I say that I mean...

Okay let's look at it like this.

Grand Theft Auto IV is not in good taste when you run around slaughtering helpless people. Or in the case of that game that replicated one of them school shootings into an RPG (fucking terrible).

BUT a game where 2 militaries fighting each other is at least fair. At least both sides have a chance of killing the other. (Even if in real life it's a one sided fuckfest of missiles being dropped from the sky).

Basically, if the NPC is given a chance to defend itself I find it's in good taste. Even if they're as stupid as fuck.

A suicide bombing dog doesn't really win in any situation.

[Dirge]

Wait, you kill animals in this one? Jesus christ.

[spiri7ussancti]

Wait, you kill animals in this one? Jesus christ.

Ya, cuz that's so much worse than mowing down hundreds of civilians in an air port.....

[Maxorhead666]

Well when I say that I mean...

Okay let's look at it like this.

Grand Theft Auto IV is not in good taste when you run around slaughtering helpless people. Or in the case of that game that replicated one of them school shootings into an RPG (fucking terrible).

BUT a game where 2 militaries fighting each other is at least fair. At least both sides have a chance of killing the other. (Even if in real life it's a one sided fuckfest of missiles being dropped from the sky).

Basically, if the NPC is given a chance to defend itself I find it's in good taste. Even if they're as stupid as fuck.

A suicide bombing dog doesn't really win in any situation.

I agree, but its the same as any media. If you can't distinguish a film or game from real life, then you have serious issues "This is like DX 5000 graphics!". I can laugh when Hitler gets shot in the face in Inglorious Basterds because its so fake, just like the whole of GTA seems ridiculous. Although GTA is one of the more borderline violent games. But back to MW3, They should have this survival thing (cos it looks like a little quick fun) but bring back spec ops as well, or a co-op campaign. I think most of my time spent with MW2 was on spec ops, cos I rarely played it online.

[Dirge]

Ya, cuz that's so much worse than mowing down hundreds of civilians in an air port.....

Ever notice how when it comes to people abusing other people no one seems to care, but the second its a poor defenseless animal, people freak the fuck out?

[spiri7ussancti]

Ever notice how when it comes to people abusing other people no one seems to care, but the second its a poor defenseless animal, people freak the fuck out?

Ya, actually....i do.