Nope, see:
That's not a valid rebuttal.
My point is, kids that have never played a first person shooter before would not run around like FPS Doug. Kids that have, when they grow up, stand a greater chance of being able to figure out where the 'enemy' is and not walk out into the middle of a street and get shot the fuck up.
Crouching behind a box is a n00b tactic anyway.
Are you going to die like a n00b?
The thing that pisses me off most about the Call of Duty series, is that there hasn't been a new game mechanic since they let you throw grenades back in CoD3. The game play is virtually the same. Sure, killstreak rewards got better, and custom loadouts are nicer, but for the most part, I haven't seen them do anything revolutionary or new forever. Now, this would not bother me, had they spent some time supporting the games. Two map packs (that they make you pay for, i might add) per game, is not "supporting" a game. There's no adjustment to bugs, game modes, or even a new gun, given over the course of the games life. They literally drop the project in a couple months and get started on marketing the next one. There's no reason we all shouldn't be playing MW1 still. They're just churning these out, because they know people will buy it no matter what they say.
I've always thought this yeah, nothing new, what is 'new' is merely something people can brag about or work to unlock.
Gone are the days of some kid making a map pack and running it on his server until enough people get it that it becomes popular. Now it's all about the 1800 point DLC's that .. make you buy more points than you want to spend.
No i've heard of it. I just don't get how u related it to my post.
I don't either but I guess when you look at it if everyone is playing BLOPS/MW3/BF3 .. what else can we play that people are enjoying apart from some lame penguin game
One of my friends owns a PS3 and ONLY CoDBLOPS

way to be a dedicated gamer